New Factory Implementation Test Plan Template
Version: 2, effective date: 06-Dec-2022
Contents
1 Standard description
This document describes the strategy, approach, processes should be applied on “New Factory Implementation” test plan.
2 Document objectives and benefits
2.1 Objectives
Objectives are aiming to provide a checklist for each, to check if the below mentioned criteria are met and working as expected.
2.1.1 Objective Item 1: GLA
- Integration testing on GLA
- GLA – SAP
- GLA – TPM
- GLA – GATE
- GLA – WMS (If Exists)
- GLA – MOM (If Exists)
- GLA – CR
- GLA – SRS(If TPD Factory)
- Functional Testing on GLA
- GLA Smoke Tests
- UAT Tests on GLA
2.1.2 Objective Item 2: SAP
- UAT on SAP
2.1.3 Objective Item 3: TPM (If TnT enabled)
- Integration testing on TPM
- TPM – CR
- TPM – GATE (If Factory does Virtual Code Pairing)
- TPM – OMS (If Factory is under Russian Federation Regulation)
- Functional Testing on TPM
- UAT on TPM
2.1.4 Objective Item 3: CR (If TnT enabled)
- Integration testing on TPM
- IF TPD market CR – PR/SR
- ELSE CR – Target Regulation
- UAT on CR
3 Definitions
| Abbreviation / Term | Explanation |
|---|---|
| TPD | Tobacco Products Directive |
| OMS | Order Management System |
| TPM | Tracking Process Manager |
| UK | United Kingdom |
| EU | European Union |
| CR | Corporate Repository |
| GB | Great Britain |
| Tracy | MS Virtual Agents chat bot that automates T&T business processes |
| 3PL Tracy | MS Virtual Agents chat bot similar to original Tracy, although designed for 3PL partners and will have features with limited access to CR |
Please refer to IT Glossary in the IT P&P portal for further definitions.
4 Test items
4.1 Planning stage
Define the test period, resource needs and estimated due dates
4.2 User manual and instrucion documents
Documents supporting test execution will be referenced(if exists)
4.3 Test preparations
-
Creation of acceptance criteria per system
-
Creation of UAT test cases per acceptance criteria
-
Estimation of test execution
-
Assignment of testers
-
Configuration of the environment where UAT test execution will be held
-
Creation and design of test data per test case
4.4 Out of scope
Below tests are out of scope:
-
Non-Functional Testing
-
Performance Testing (depending on the need this can be discussed with local teams)
-
Security Testing
-
Accessibility Testing
-
Usability Testing
-
Functional Testing
-
E2E business Tests
-
Regression Tests
5 Test strategy
5.1 Test approach
In Test Plan below testing methods and suites will be used.
- User Acceptance Testing – Add there reference link for both acceptance criteria and test cases
5.2 Tools to be used
List the tools will be used.
5.3 Defect management
5.3.1 Bug Trackers
Bugs found will be trace with below Tags.
- To be filled(ITSP,JIRA,WL JIRA)(QA,PPR,)
5.3.2 Exit Criteria
From Critical to Major : Only fix, retested by QA team and approved to be resolved
From Normal to Minor : Two conditions are acceptable, first is fix, retested by QA team and approved to be resolved, second is project manager approval for later fix after production deployment.
5.4 Special requirements
Below points to be considered and delivered before test case creation/execution
- Test Data
- Market
- Facility
- Regulation related data
- Request/Response samples
- Message sample
- Master Data
- Configuration
- User Account for Market and Facility
- Security Authorization and Environment Information
- API urls
- Certificates
6 Test deliverables
6.1 Periodic reports
Daily or Weekly test reports for internal usage
6.2 Final report
After UAT Team’s test execution, will be shared with relevant stakeholders
6.3 Defect report
Will be used to track defects found with up-to-date status and brief explanation from UAT Team
7 Communication
7.1 Communication methods and tools
- Test Alignment Meeting with IT and UAT Team via Teams
- Mail chain for seamless communication
7.2 UAT team
To be filled – UAT Director
To be filled – UAT Manager
To be filled – UAT Tester
7.3 IT team
To be filled
8 Document control
8.1 Document Owner
The owner of this document is Berhan Cem Ozelbicer.
8.2 Contact person
Questions and feedback regarding this test plan template should be submitted to Berhan Cem Ozelbicer.
8.3 Revision History
| Version | Effective date | Purpose of change | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 06-Dec-2022 | First version | Berhan Cem Ozelbicer |
| 1 | 30-Nov-2022 | Initial draft | Berhan Cem Ozelbicer |
ANY QUESTIONS?